State v. Teer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Teer

959 S.W.2d 930, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 51, 1998 WL 9436

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 13, 1998

DocketNo. 71576

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 959 S.W.2d 930 (State v. Teer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Teer, 959 S.W.2d 930, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 51, 1998 WL 9436 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Teer, Defendant, appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to his jury conviction for four counts of involuntary manslaughter and one count of second degree assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Teer, Defendant, appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to his jury conviction for four counts of involuntary manslaughter and one count of second degree assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

959 S.W.2d 930, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 51, 1998 WL 9436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-teer-moctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack