State v. Teeman
This text of 465 P.2d 915 (State v. Teeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[213]*213The defendant, having been found guilty of a felony by a jury, appeals.
His sole contention on appeal is that under the Constitution of the United States the defendant was entitled to have the jury instructed that to find him guilty the jurors must unanimously agree as to his guilt. This issue has been decided contra to the defendant’s contention in State v. Gann, 254 Or 549, 463 P2d 570 (1969).
Affirmed.
This appeal does not involve a first-degree murder conviction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 P.2d 915, 2 Or. App. 212, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-teeman-orctapp-1970.