State v. Tee Corp.

1 N.J.L. 393
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1795·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no necessity for a previous no» tice to be given of such a motion: if the writ issues improvidently it is a ground of defence and may be taken advantage of on the return. We think there is sufficient information before rhe court to induce us to allow the writ. Let a Certiorari issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tee Corp., 1 N.J.L. 393 (N.J. 1795).

1 N.J.L. 393 (State v. Tee Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related