State v. Teague
This text of 517 A.2d 1074 (State v. Teague) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Russell Teague, Jr. appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Androscoggin County, entered after a jury verdict of guilty of reckless conduct with use of a dangerous weapon, a firearm. 17-A M.R. S.A. § 211 (1983). Teague challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Examining the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, we conclude that the jury rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
517 A.2d 1074, 1986 Me. LEXIS 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-teague-me-1986.