State v. Tayon

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Tayon

117 S.W.3d 721, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1555, 2003 WL 22232970

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 30, 2003

DocketNo. ED 82327

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 S.W.3d 721 (State v. Tayon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tayon, 117 S.W.3d 721, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1555, 2003 WL 22232970 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[722]*722 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael Tayon, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.07(d) motion to -withdraw his guilty plea to charges on which sentence was imposed, but execution of the sentence was suspended. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

A Rule 29.07(d) motion to revoke a guilty plea is a civil proceeding, although it is not a separate action and retains the same docket number. State v. Larson, 79 S.W.3d 891, 893 (Mo. banc 2002). We therefore affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[722]*722 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael Tayon, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.07(d) motion to -withdraw his guilty plea to charges on which sentence was imposed, but execution of the sentence was suspended. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

A Rule 29.07(d) motion to revoke a guilty plea is a civil proceeding, although it is not a separate action and retains the same docket number. State v. Larson, 79 S.W.3d 891, 893 (Mo. banc 2002). We therefore affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 S.W.3d 721, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1555, 2003 WL 22232970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tayon-moctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack