State v. Taylor

491 P.3d 89, 313 Or. App. 488
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 21, 2021
DocketA169670
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 491 P.3d 89 (State v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Taylor, 491 P.3d 89, 313 Or. App. 488 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Argued and submitted May 29, 2020; reversed and remanded, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed Juy 21, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOHN HOWARD TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 18CR48676; A169670 491 P3d 89

Ricardo J. Menchaca, Judge. Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services. E. Nani Apo, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge.* PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

______________ * Tookey, J., vice DeVore, J. Cite as 313 Or App 488 (2021) 489

PER CURIAM In this criminal appeal, we write to accept the state’s concession of an argument in defendant’s fourth assignment of error. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the crime for which defendant was convicted—attempted fourth-degree assault—is a Class A misdemeanor. Defendant posits—and the state agrees—that the trial court was required to enter a judgment of convic- tion for a Class B misdemeanor. Because we agree with the parties (without stating the specifics of the circumstances), we reverse the judgment and remand so that the trial court can enter a conviction of attempted fourth-degree assault as a Class B misdemeanor. We reject defendant’s remaining assignments of error without discussion. Reversed and remanded; remanded for resentenc- ing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Coats
491 P.3d 89 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
491 P.3d 89, 313 Or. App. 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-taylor-orctapp-2021.