State v. Taylor

2024 Ohio 2215
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 198 N.E.3d 956
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 2024·No. 2024-A-0044·Published

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Taylor, 2024-Ohio-2215.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2024-A-0044

Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas

DANIEL ALAN TAYLOR, Trial Court No. 2021 CR 00393 Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Decided: June 10, 2024 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Colleen M. O’Toole, Ashtabula County Prosecutor, 25 West Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH 44047 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Daniel Alan Taylor, pro se, PID# A792-992, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, 1724 State Route 728, P.O. Box 45699, Lucasville, OH 45699 (Defendant-Appellant).

ROBERT J. PATTON, J.

{¶1} Appellant, Daniel Alan Taylor, pro se, filed a notice of appeal on May 17,

2024, from the trial court’s August 19, 2022 sentencing entry. A timely appeal from the

August entry was due no later than September 19, 2022, which was not a holiday or

weekend. Thus, the appeal is untimely filed by approximately one year and eight months.

{¶2} App.R. 4(A)(1) states in relevant part:

{¶3} “[A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry

shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” {¶4} App.R. 5(A) states, in relevant part:

{¶5} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶6} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * *

{¶7} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and

shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right.”

{¶8} Here, appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in

App.R. 4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without

jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

{¶9} Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as being untimely.

{¶10} Appeal dismissed.

EUGENE A. LUCCI, P.J.,

MATT LYNCH, J.,

concur.

Case No. 2024-A-0044

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Taylor, 2024 Ohio 2215 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).

2024 Ohio 2215 (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.