State v. Taylor

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Taylor

847 N.E.2d 4, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1454

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 10, 2006

Docket2006-0568

StatusPublished

This text of 847 N.E.2d 4 (State v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Taylor, 847 N.E.2d 4, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1454 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Montgomery App. Nos. 20649, 20654 and 20655, 2006-Ohio-313. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry filed February 28, 2006:

‘Whether a conviction for an attempted drug offense that would have been, if successfully completed, a first-degree felony, but which becomes a second degree felony by virtue of the fact that it is merely an attempt to commit an offense, is subject to the mandatory prison term provisions in R.C. 2925.11.”

Resnicic, Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Pringle (June 30,1999), Lucas App. No. L-98-1275.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. Nos. 20649, 20654 and 20655, 2006-Ohio-313. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry filed February 28, 2006:

‘Whether a conviction for an attempted drug offense that would have been, if successfully completed, a first-degree felony, but which becomes a second degree felony by virtue of the fact that it is merely an attempt to commit an offense, is subject to the mandatory prison term provisions in R.C. 2925.11.”

Resnicic, Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Pringle (June 30,1999), Lucas App. No. L-98-1275.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 N.E.2d 4, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-taylor-ohio-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack