State v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Taylor

353 S.W.3d 98, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1228, 2011 WL 4369300

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 20, 2011

DocketED95208

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 353 S.W.3d 98 (State v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Taylor, 353 S.W.3d 98, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1228, 2011 WL 4369300 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William E. Taylor appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for first-degree murder, armed criminal action, and trespass. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William E. Taylor appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for first-degree murder, armed criminal action, and trespass. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2011).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 S.W.3d 98, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1228, 2011 WL 4369300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-taylor-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack