State v. Taylor
22 S.W.3d 244, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105, 2000 WL 994204
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901 →
Opinion
ORDER
Frenchie Taylor (Defendant) appeals from the judgment entered following his jury conviction for sale of a controlled substance, section 195.211, RSMo .1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth [245]*245the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Taylor, 22 S.W.3d 244, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105, 2000 WL 994204 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
22 S.W.3d 244 (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.