State v. Taylor.

511 So. 2d 1141, 1987 La. LEXIS 9864
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 11, 1987·No. No. 87-KK-1918·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ denied.

Pursuant to an order from this court, the trial judge conducted a pretrial hearing on the admissibility of the attorney-client communications. The evidence credited by the trial judge established that the communications, more probably than not, were made in pursuit of a criminal act of conspiracy to hide the apparent murder weapon and are not protected by the attorney-client privilege.

DENNIS, J., concurs but notes that the privilege is still intact and enforceable as to those attorney-client communications not made in furtherance of a criminal act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Taylor., 511 So. 2d 1141, 1987 La. LEXIS 9864 (La. 1987).

511 So. 2d 1141 (State v. Taylor.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Taylor
550 So. 2d 712 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
State v. Taylor
513 So. 2d 281 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1987)