State v. Taylor

349 So. 2d 1245, 1977 La. LEXIS 6377
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 19, 1977·No. No. 59513·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record discloses that the defendant was sentenced only two days following his conviction, rather than the three days required by article 873 of the Code of Crim-[1246]*1246mal Procedure, and does not indicate that the defendant waived his right to the mandatory delay period. Even though defendant did not object to this error at the time of sentencing or urge it on appeal, the error is considered by this Court since it is discoverable by mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence. La.C.Cr.P. art. 920(2); State v. Young, 337 So.2d 1196 (La.1976).

Defendant’s conviction is affirmed, but the sentence imposed is vacated and set aside, and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to the trial judge to sentence defendant in accordance with law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Taylor, 349 So. 2d 1245, 1977 La. LEXIS 6377 (La. 1977).

349 So. 2d 1245 (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McNeal
785 So. 2d 957 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
State v. Dickerson
538 So. 2d 1063 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
State v. Coleman
514 So. 2d 583 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)