State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

State v. Taylor

730 So. 2d 616, 1999 Ala. LEXIS 89, 1999 WL 164414

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 26, 1999·No. 1972217·Published

Opinion

COOK, Justice.

The petition for the writ of mandamus is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of mandamus, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the related opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Ex parte Taylor, 720 So.2d 1054 (Ala.Crim.App.1998). See Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, SEE, and LYONS, JJ., concur. KENNEDY, J., concurs in the result. JOHNSTONE, J., dissents. BROWN, J., recuses herself.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COOK, Justice.

The petition for the writ of mandamus is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of mandamus, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the related opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Ex parte Taylor, 720 So.2d 1054 (Ala.Crim.App.1998). See Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, SEE, and LYONS, JJ., concur. KENNEDY, J., concurs in the result. JOHNSTONE, J., dissents. BROWN, J., recuses herself.

State v. Taylor, 730 So. 2d 616, 1999 Ala. LEXIS 89, 1999 WL 164414 (Ala. 1999).

Pincite

730 So. 2d 616 (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related