State v. Tatum

949 A.2d 846, 195 N.J. 416, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 437
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 20, 2008
DocketC-546 September Term 2007, 61,610
StatusPublished

This text of 949 A.2d 846 (State v. Tatum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Tatum, 949 A.2d 846, 195 N.J. 416, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 437 (N.J. 2008).

Opinion

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the Court having determined that the Appellate Division improvidently reversed defendant’s conviction before remanding the matter to the trial court for further proceedings;

IT IS ORDERED that the portion of the Appellate Division’s judgment that reversed defendant’s conviction is vacated; and it is further

ORDERED that the within matter is summarily remanded to the trial court to conduct an N.J.R.E. 104(a) hearing to determine if the testimony of the psychologist, Dr. J. Dennis Cadigan, and the substance abuse evaluator, Terry McCorkell, would be of assistance to the jury; and it is further ORDERED that if the trial court determines that the testimony would not assist the jury in arriving at a verdict, defendant’s conviction and sentence shall stand; and it is further

ORDERED that if the trial court determines that Dr. Cadigan’s or Mr. McCorkell’s testimony would be of assistance to the jury, it shall vacate defendant’s conviction and sentence and set the matter down for retrial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. SHOMARI
949 A.2d 846 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
949 A.2d 846, 195 N.J. 416, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tatum-nj-2008.