State v. Tatum

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Tatum

406 S.W.3d 51, 2012 WL 8978154, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1659

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 1, 2012

DocketNo. WD 73243

StatusPublished

This text of 406 S.W.3d 51 (State v. Tatum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tatum, 406 S.W.3d 51, 2012 WL 8978154, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1659 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Elmer Tatum appeals from his conviction of one count of trafficking in the second degree, § 195.223. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Elmer Tatum appeals from his conviction of one count of trafficking in the second degree, § 195.223. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

406 S.W.3d 51, 2012 WL 8978154, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tatum-moctapp-2012.