State v. Tate
362 S.W.3d 484, 2012 WL 941406, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 356
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Tate. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 97 →
Opinion
ORDER
Deangelo Tate appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of second-degree murder and armed criminal action. We find that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of Tate’s earlier acts, and in its submission of jury instructions.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Tate, 362 S.W.3d 484, 2012 WL 941406, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 356 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
362 S.W.3d 484 (State v. Tate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hartwein v. Hartwein
362 S.W.3d 484 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)