State v. Tate

172 Iowa 264
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 20, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 172 Iowa 264 (State v. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Tate, 172 Iowa 264 (iowa 1915).

Opinion

Ladd, J.

appeal? want7: appellant? m The two cases are submitted together. White was convicted under one indictment and Tate and Link under another, each alleging the maintenance of a liquor nuisance in a certain building; and in each ease a writ of abatement was issued, ordering the sheriff to securely close the building for one year. The parties stipulated that none of them owned any interest in the premises described and that the fines and costs had been paid. Manifestly, then, defendants are in no manner concerned in whether the buildings are securely closed or not; and, as they have no interest in the controversy, their appeal should be and is — Dismissed.

Deemer, C. J., Gaynor and Salinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 Iowa 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tate-iowa-1915.