State v. Tardif

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Tardif

739 N.E.2d 813, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3099

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 13, 2000

Docket00-1381

StatusPublished

This text of 739 N.E.2d 813 (State v. Tardif) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tardif, 739 N.E.2d 813, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3099 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Portage App. No. 99-P-0031. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal as of right. On August 2, 2000, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals, and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. 17(1),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within ten days of the date of . this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Portage App. No. 99-P-0031. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal as of right. On August 2, 2000, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals, and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. 17(1),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within ten days of the date of . this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 111(6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

739 N.E.2d 813, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tardif-ohio-2000.