State v. Tardif

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Tardif

555 A.2d 477, 1989 Me. LEXIS 47

DecidedMarch 10, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 555 A.2d 477 (State v. Tardif) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tardif, 555 A.2d 477, 1989 Me. LEXIS 47 (Me. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Contrary to Gerard Tardif s contention in his appeal from the judgment of the Superi- or Court (Androscoggin County; Brodrick, J.) entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.1988) (unlawful sexual contact), there was no clear error in the finding of the trial court that Tardif was competent to stand trial. See State v. Hewett, 538 A.2d 268, 269 (Me.1988); State v. Perkins, 518 A.2d 715, 716 (Me.1986); State v. Knights, 482 A.2d 436, 439 (Me. 1984).

The entry is: Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Contrary to Gerard Tardif s contention in his appeal from the judgment of the Superi- or Court (Androscoggin County; Brodrick, J.) entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.1988) (unlawful sexual contact), there was no clear error in the finding of the trial court that Tardif was competent to stand trial. See State v. Hewett, 538 A.2d 268, 269 (Me.1988); State v. Perkins, 518 A.2d 715, 716 (Me.1986); State v. Knights, 482 A.2d 436, 439 (Me. 1984).

The entry is: Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 A.2d 477, 1989 Me. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tardif-me-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack