Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Tardanico

State v. Tardanico

888 P.2d 15
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 28, 1994
Docket9402-95325 CA A83206
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 888 P.2d 15 (State v. Tardanico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Tardanico, 888 P.2d 15 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

888 P.2d 15 (1994)
132 Or.App. 230

In the Matter of Charlene Tardanico, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Charlene TARDANICO, Appellant.

9402-95325; CA A83206.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted December 9, 1994.
Decided December 28, 1994.

*16 Paul L. Breed argued the cause and filed the brief, Portland, for appellant.

Stephen L. Madkour, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this mental commitment case, the trial court failed to advise appellant of her rights under ORS 426.100. As we held in State v. May, 131 Or.App. 570, 888 P.2d 14 (1994), advisement of those rights is mandatory, and a failure to advise or to determine that there has been a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to be advised requires reversal.

The state contends that the error was not preserved in the trial court. We conclude that the error is apparent on the face of the record, ORAP 5.45(2), and that it is an egregious one. We exercise our discretion to review the error. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or. 376, 381, 823 P.2d 956 (1991).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. K. J. B.
387 P.3d 467 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
State v. K. M.
340 P.3d 121 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)
State v. C. M. W.
333 P.3d 1079 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)
State v. S. J. F.
269 P.3d 83 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. SJF
269 P.3d 83 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. M. T.
232 P.3d 980 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. MT
258 P.3d 1288 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. Ritzman
84 P.3d 1129 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
State v. Beardsley
7 P.3d 654 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)
State v. Morse
952 P.2d 573 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)
State v. Yauger
945 P.2d 95 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)
State v. Garcia
945 P.2d 95 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)
State v. Linder
935 P.2d 481 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)
State v. Murphy
934 P.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)
State v. Lombardi
925 P.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
State v. Trong Ngoc Vinh
922 P.2d 1278 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
State v. Idzardi
919 P.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
State v. Weyeneth
917 P.2d 75 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
State v. Gunderson
917 P.2d 55 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
Statel v. Hill
915 P.2d 1057 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
888 P.2d 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tardanico-orctapp-1994.