State v. Tanner
826 N.E.2d 857, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1537
Opinion
Medina App. No. 04CA0062-M, 2005-Ohio-998. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due April 25, 2005 in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Tanner, 826 N.E.2d 857, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1537 (Ohio 2005).
826 N.E.2d 857 (State v. Tanner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Tanner, Unpublished Decision (3-9-2005)
2005 Ohio 998 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)