State v. Tallman

484 P.3d 1132, 310 Or. App. 576
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 7, 2021·No. A170902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Submitted March 9; convictions on Counts 1 through 6 and Count 12 reversed and remanded, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed April 7, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

EMILY TALLMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Multnomah County Circuit Court 17CR41142; A170902

484 P3d 1132

Melvin Oden-Orr, Judge. Lindsey Burrows and O’Connor Weber LLC filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge.

PER CURIAM Convictions on Counts 1 through 6 and Count 12 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Cite as 310 Or App 576 (2021) 577

PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted of fourteen counts of first-

degree theft, ORS 164.055, and seven counts of aggravated first-degree theft, ORS 164.057.1 The convictions on Counts 1 through 6 and Count 12 were by nonunanimous jury verdict . Defendant appeals the judgment of conviction, raising three assignments of error. We reject her first assignment without discussion. In her second and third assignments of error, she contends that the trial court erred under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution by instructing the jury that it could return nonunanimous guilty verdicts and by receiving nonunanimous verdicts. Defendant asks us to reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial as to Counts 1 through 6 and Count 12.

In Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020), the United States Supreme Court concluded that nonunanimous jury verdicts violated the Sixth Amendment. The state concedes that because the convictions on Counts 1 through 6 and Count 12 were not the result of unanimous verdicts, those convictions should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Convictions on Counts 1 through 6 and Count 12 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

1 On the state’s pretrial motion, the trial court dismissed one count of possession of methamphetamine.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tallman, 484 P.3d 1132, 310 Or. App. 576 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

484 P.3d 1132 (State v. Tallman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Manns
484 P.3d 1132 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)