State v. Taft
744 S.E.2d 467, 366 N.C. 594
Opinion
1. Defendant Fernandez Kabrer Taft NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12-646)
2. Defendant Fernandez Kabrer Taft’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
3. Defendant Frederick Karl Taft., Jr.’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question
4. Defendant Frederick Karl Taft, Jr.’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
5. State’s Motion to Dismiss Both Appeals
1. ---
2. Denied
3.---
4. Denied
5. Allowed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Taft, 744 S.E.2d 467, 366 N.C. 594 (N.C. 2013).
744 S.E.2d 467 (State v. Taft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31