State v. Taft

744 S.E.2d 467, 366 N.C. 594
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 12, 2013·No. 145P13·Published

Opinion

1. Defendant Fernandez Kabrer Taft NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12-646)

2. Defendant Fernandez Kabrer Taft’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Defendant Frederick Karl Taft., Jr.’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question

4. Defendant Frederick Karl Taft, Jr.’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

5. State’s Motion to Dismiss Both Appeals

1. ---

2. Denied

3.---

4. Denied
5. Allowed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Taft, 744 S.E.2d 467, 366 N.C. 594 (N.C. 2013).

744 S.E.2d 467 (State v. Taft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31