State v. Taft

487 So. 2d 1068, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 213, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1977
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 8, 1986·No. No. 67165·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ADKINS, Justice.

In Taft v. State, 468 So.2d 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), the court vacated Taft’s sentence because he was sentenced pursuant to the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing as opposed to the guidelines in effect at the time the crime was committed. In State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), we held that the trial court may sentence a defendant pursuant to the guidelines in effect at the time of sentenc: ing.

Accordingly, the decision of the district court is quashed.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD and SHAW, JJ., concur. EHRLICH, J., concurs specially with an opinion, in which SHAW, J., concurs. BARKETT, J., concurs specially with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Taft, 487 So. 2d 1068, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 213, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1977 (Fla. 1986).

487 So. 2d 1068 (State v. Taft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Tisdale
492 So. 2d 1071 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)