State v. Taft
753 A.2d 942, 253 Conn. 909, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 166
This text of 753 A.2d 942 (State v. Taft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Taft, 753 A.2d 942, 253 Conn. 909, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 166 (Colo. 2000).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 57 Conn. App. 19 (AC 18629), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion for a mistrial?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Taft
781 A.2d 302 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
753 A.2d 942, 253 Conn. 909, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-taft-conn-2000.