State v. Tabbaa

787 N.E.2d 1227, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1561
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 2003·No. 2003-0334·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 81410, 151 Ohio App.3d 353, 2003-Ohio-299. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed February 7, 2003:

“Motion by appellant to certify a conflict is granted. This court’s decision in State v. Tabbaa, Cuyahoga App. No. 81410, 2003-Ohio-299, is in conflict with State v. Yuen, Franklin App. No. 01AP-1410, 2002-Ohio-5083. The following question is certified:

“In considering a case involving delay in filing a motion to withdraw a guilty plea pursuant to R.C. 2943.031, does the court have discretion to deny the motion by reading a timeliness requirement into R.C. 2943.031 (as the Ohio Supreme Court did in State v. Bush, 96 Ohio St.3d 235, 2002-Ohio-3993, regarding a Crim.R. 32.1 motion), or, is the trial court without discretion and therefore required to set aside the guilty plea and conviction as the court held in State v. Yuen?"

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tabbaa, 787 N.E.2d 1227, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1561 (Ohio 2003).

787 N.E.2d 1227 (State v. Tabbaa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Colthirst, Unpublished Decision (11-18-2004)
2004 Ohio 6118 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
State v. Suleiman, Unpublished Decision (8-26-2004)
2004 Ohio 4487 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)