State v. T. W. (In re T. W.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. T. W. (In re T. W.)

436 P.3d 98, 296 Or. App. 752

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 20, 2019·No. A168537·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*753Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In her sole assignment of error, appellant contends that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence that, due to a mental disorder, she was unable to provide for her basic needs. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B). The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court's determination that appellant was a person with mental illness and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*753Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In her sole assignment of error, appellant contends that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence that, due to a mental disorder, she was unable to provide for her basic needs. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B). The state concedes that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court's determination that appellant was a person with mental illness and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment.

Reversed.

State v. T. W. (In re T. W.), 436 P.3d 98, 296 Or. App. 752 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

436 P.3d 98 (State v. T. W. (In re T. W.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related