State v. T. S. Z.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. T. S. Z.

157 P.3d 311, 212 Or. App. 216, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 535

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 18, 2007·No. 060666754; A133043·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is presently a danger to herself or unable to provide for her basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is presently a danger to herself or unable to provide for her basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

State v. T. S. Z., 157 P.3d 311, 212 Or. App. 216, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 535 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

157 P.3d 311 (State v. T. S. Z.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.