State v. T. S.

168 P.3d 1259, 215 Or. App. 348, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1372
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 3, 2007·No. M060211; A131853·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs or is a danger to himself or others because of his mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should' be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. T. S., 168 P.3d 1259, 215 Or. App. 348, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1372 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

168 P.3d 1259 (State v. T. S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005