State v. T. S.

168 P.3d 1259, 215 Or. App. 348, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1372
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 3, 2007
DocketM060211; A131853
StatusPublished

This text of 168 P.3d 1259 (State v. T. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. T. S., 168 P.3d 1259, 215 Or. App. 348, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1372 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs or is a danger to himself or others because of his mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should' be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 P.3d 1259, 215 Or. App. 348, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-t-s-orctapp-2007.