State v. T. Mercier

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. T. Mercier. Read the opinion of the Court — 403 Mont. 34
Montana Supreme Court·Decided August 24, 2020·No. DA 18-0006·Unpublished

Opinion

ORIG:NAL 08/24/2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 18-0006

DA 18-0006 Fr' STATE OF MONTANA, AUG 2 it 21170 Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. ORDER

TREVOR JOSEPH MERCIER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for oral argument before the Court sitting en banc and is hereby set for argument on Wednesday, October 14, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. in the Courtroom of the Montana Supreme Court, Joseph P. Mazurek Justice Building, Helena, Montana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to M. R. App. P. 17(3), oral argument times in this cause number shall be forty (40) minutes for the Appellant and thirty (30) minutes for the Appellee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that oral argument shall be directed to the following issue: Was Mercier denied his rights under both the United States and Montana Constitutions to be confronted face-to-face by the witnesses against him when the State was allowed to present a foundational witness in real time by the use of a two-way video communication system?

Counsel should be mindful of the provisions of M. R. App. P. 17(6). Any counsel wishing to participate in argument remotely shall contact the Clerk of Court to make arrangernents. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Matthew Cuffe, District Judge. `tir. DATED this e day of August, 2020. For the Court,

By Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. T. Mercier, (Mo. 2020).

State v. T. Mercier (State v. T. Mercier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.