State v. T. M. W.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. T. M. W.

473 P.3d 146, 306 Or. App. 560

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 16, 2020

DocketA173439

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 473 P.3d 146 (State v. T. M. W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. T. M. W., 473 P.3d 146, 306 Or. App. 560 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted August 7, reversed September 16, 2020

In the Matter of T. M. W., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. T. M. W., Appellant. Benton County Circuit Court 20CC00715; A173439 473 P3d 146

Matthew J. Donohue, Judge. Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Wilsey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Cite as 306 Or App 560 (2020) 561

PER CURIAM Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days and an order prohibiting her from purchasing or possessing firearms. She contends that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to advise her of the information required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes that the trial court plainly erred in that regard and that the judgment and firearms order must be reversed. We agree with the state’s concession and, for the reasons expressed in State v. S. J. F., 247 Or App 321, 325, 269 P3d 83 (2011), exercise our discretion to correct the error by reversing the commitment judgment and firearms order. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted August 7, reversed September 16, 2020

In the Matter of T. M. W., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. T. M. W., Appellant. Benton County Circuit Court 20CC00715; A173439 473 P3d 146

Matthew J. Donohue, Judge. Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Wilsey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Cite as 306 Or App 560 (2020) 561

PER CURIAM Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days and an order prohibiting her from purchasing or possessing firearms. She contends that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to advise her of the information required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes that the trial court plainly erred in that regard and that the judgment and firearms order must be reversed. We agree with the state’s concession and, for the reasons expressed in State v. S. J. F., 247 Or App 321, 325, 269 P3d 83 (2011), exercise our discretion to correct the error by reversing the commitment judgment and firearms order. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 P.3d 146, 306 Or. App. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-t-m-w-orctapp-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack