State v. T. J. W.

322 Or. App. 461
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 19, 2022
DocketA176258
StatusUnpublished

This text of 322 Or. App. 461 (State v. T. J. W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. T. J. W., 322 Or. App. 461 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). Submitted September 26, affirmed October 19, 2022

In the Matter of T. J. W., a Youth. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. T. J. W., Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 150601J; A176258

Colleen F. Gilmartin, Judge pro tempore. Erica Hayne Friedman and Youth, Rights & Justice filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jon Zunkel-deCoursey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. A. R. H., 314 Or App 672, 499 P3d 851 (2021), rev allowed, 369 Or 504 (2022).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. A. R. H.
499 P.3d 851 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 Or. App. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-t-j-w-orctapp-2022.