State v. T. A. L.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. T. A. L.

477 P.3d 1237, 308 Or. App. 108

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedDecember 16, 2020

DocketA174015

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 477 P.3d 1237 (State v. T. A. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. T. A. L., 477 P.3d 1237, 308 Or. App. 108 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted November 9, reversed December 16, 2020

In the Matter of T. A. L., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. T. A. L., Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 20CC02322; A174015 477 P3d 1237

Douglas V. Van Dyk, Judge. Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Greg Rios, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Cite as 308 Or App 108 (2020) 109

PER CURIAM The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days based on a determination that he was unable to meet his basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B). Appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evi- dence to support the court’s conclusion that he is a danger to others. The state concedes that the record is legally insuffi- cient in that regard and that the judgment of commitment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the commitment. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted November 9, reversed December 16, 2020

In the Matter of T. A. L., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. T. A. L., Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 20CC02322; A174015 477 P3d 1237

Douglas V. Van Dyk, Judge. Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Greg Rios, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Cite as 308 Or App 108 (2020) 109

PER CURIAM The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days based on a determination that he was unable to meet his basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B). Appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evi- dence to support the court’s conclusion that he is a danger to others. The state concedes that the record is legally insuffi- cient in that regard and that the judgment of commitment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the commitment. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 P.3d 1237, 308 Or. App. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-t-a-l-orctapp-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack