State v. T. A. C.

323 Or. App. 530
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 29, 2022
DocketA177869
StatusUnpublished

This text of 323 Or. App. 530 (State v. T. A. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. T. A. C., 323 Or. App. 530 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). Submitted December 2, affirmed December 29, 2022

In the Matter of T. A. C., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. T. A. C., Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 21CC07241; A177869

Cody M. Weston, Judge. Alexander C. Cambier and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Peenesh Shah, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. M. D. D., 323 Or App 442, 523 P3d 1152 (2022).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. M. D. D.
523 P.3d 1152 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 Or. App. 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-t-a-c-orctapp-2022.