State v. Szempruch

634 So. 2d 818, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3267, 1994 WL 115284
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 1994·No. No. 93-2097·Published

Opinions

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. Appellant alleges and appellee agrees the court departed downwards from the sentencing guidelines without giving clear and convincing written reasons.

Both the appellant and appellee say that because appellee was induced to enter his plea of nolo contendere based upon assurances from the state, that this court “should reverse the sentence of the trial court, with directions to permit Defendant to withdraw his pleas of nolo contendere and to reinstate his prior pleas of not guilty ...” (appellee) and “start from ground zero” (appellant).

The sentence is vacated, the judgment withholding adjudication is reversed and this cause remanded for reinstatement of the pleas of not guilty and further proceedings.

SENTENCE VACATED, JUDGMENT REVERSED; REMANDED.

THOMPSON, J., concurs. GRIFFIN J., concurs specially in result, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Szempruch, 634 So. 2d 818, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3267, 1994 WL 115284 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

634 So. 2d 818 (State v. Szempruch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. State
561 So. 2d 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)