State v. Szarkowskiz

Eighth Circuit

State v. Szarkowskiz

151 F.2d 153, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3323

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 11, 1945

DocketNo. 13080

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 151 F.2d 153 (State v. Szarkowskiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Szarkowskiz, 151 F.2d 153, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3323 (8th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee, a farmer-debtor who was adjudged a bankrupt under § 75, sub. s, of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, sub. s, sought to redeem his land by depositing in court the amount for which it had been reappraised. See § 75, sub. s(3). The appellant, a secured creditor holding a sheriff’s certificate of mortgage foreclosure sale issued upon foreclosure of a mortgage held by the appellant, made a written request for a public sale pursuant to the provisions of § 75, sub. s(3), 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, sub. s(3). The Conciliation Commissioner denied the request of the appellant for a public sale. Upon review, the District Court affirmed the Commissioner, and this appeal followed.

The opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Wright v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., 311 U.S. 273, 61 S.Ct. 196, 85 L.Ed. 184, and the opinion of this Court in Wolfheim v. State of South Dakota, 150 F.2d 1005, require the affirmance of the order appealed from.

The order is affirmed - and the Clerk of this Court is directed to issue a mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellee, a farmer-debtor who was adjudged a bankrupt under § 75, sub. s, of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, sub. s, sought to redeem his land by depositing in court the amount for which it had been reappraised. See § 75, sub. s(3). The appellant, a secured creditor holding a sheriff’s certificate of mortgage foreclosure sale issued upon foreclosure of a mortgage held by the appellant, made a written request for a public sale pursuant to the provisions of § 75, sub. s(3), 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, sub. s(3). The Conciliation Commissioner denied the request of the appellant for a public sale. Upon review, the District Court affirmed the Commissioner, and this appeal followed.

The opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Wright v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., 311 U.S. 273, 61 S.Ct. 196, 85 L.Ed. 184, and the opinion of this Court in Wolfheim v. State of South Dakota, 150 F.2d 1005, require the affirmance of the order appealed from.

The order is affirmed - and the Clerk of this Court is directed to issue a mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 F.2d 153, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-szarkowskiz-ca8-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack