State v. Swinney

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Swinney

312 S.W.3d 488, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 772, 2010 WL 2284223

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 8, 2010

DocketED 93120

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 312 S.W.3d 488 (State v. Swinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Swinney, 312 S.W.3d 488, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 772, 2010 WL 2284223 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Revon Swinney (“Defendant”) was convicted by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance by possessing cocaine base in violation of Section 195.202 1 one count of possession of a controlled substance by possessing methylene-dioxymethamphetamine in violation of Section 195.202 and one count of resisting arrest in violation of Section 575.150. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a persistent drug offender to a total of twenty years’ and six months’ imprisonment. The court suspended execution of its sentence and sentenced Defendant to the long-term substance abuse program pursuant to Section 217.362.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo.2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Revon Swinney (“Defendant”) was convicted by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance by possessing cocaine base in violation of Section 195.202 1 one count of possession of a controlled substance by possessing methylene-dioxymethamphetamine in violation of Section 195.202 and one count of resisting arrest in violation of Section 575.150. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a persistent drug offender to a total of twenty years’ and six months’ imprisonment. The court suspended execution of its sentence and sentenced Defendant to the long-term substance abuse program pursuant to Section 217.362.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo.2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

312 S.W.3d 488, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 772, 2010 WL 2284223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-swinney-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack