State v. Swink
663 S.W.2d 777, 1983 Mo. App. LEXIS 4268
Opinion
ORDER
Appeal from jury conviction for kidnapping and robbery and court-imposed consecutive five and ten year sentences.
Defendant relies on refusal of his verbose not-in-MAI-CR identification instruction, comparable to that refused in State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151 [19, 20] (Mo. banc 1979). Refusal accorded with State v. Jones, 607 S.W.2d 740[2] (Mo.App.1980), and MAI-CR 2d 2.01, Note 2.
No purpose would be served by a full written opinion. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Swink, 663 S.W.2d 777, 1983 Mo. App. LEXIS 4268 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983).
663 S.W.2d 777 (State v. Swink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Higgins
592 S.W.2d 151 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1979)
State v. Jones
607 S.W.2d 740 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)