State v. Swenson

203 N.W.2d 388, 295 Minn. 526, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1141
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Swenson. Read the opinion of the Court — 301 Minn. 199
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 15, 1972·No. No. 43566·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted after a trial without a jury of violating Minn. St. 169.14, specifically of driving 65 miles per hour in a 50-mile-per-hour zone, contends on this appeal from judgment that the court erred in admitting testimony by the arresting officer that with the aid of his speedometer he clocked defendant at a speed of 70 miles per hour in a 50-mile-per-hour zone. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the several issues raised (some for the first time on this appeal) with respect to the admissibility of this testimony do not warrant discussion.

The respondent has not complied with the rules of this court and has not timely filed its brief. Therefore, no costs shall be allowed to any of the parties.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Swenson, 203 N.W.2d 388, 295 Minn. 526, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1141 (Mich. 1972).

203 N.W.2d 388 (State v. Swenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.