State v. Swearengen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Swearengen

854 P.2d 505, 121 Or. App. 425, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1015

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 23, 1993·No. 89D102065; CA A74721; 92D101377; CA A74722; 90D102707; CA A74723; 91D104506; CA A74724; 91D106357; CA A74725; 89D100516; CA A74749·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from six judgments requiring execution of defendant’s previously suspended sentences for four convictions for driving under the influence of intoxicants and two convictions for driving while suspended. The state concedes that the court erred by ordering that the sentences in 91D104506 and 89D100516 run consecutively both to each other and to the sentences for three other unrelated convictions. State v. McBride, 103 Or App 642, 798 P2d 728 (1990). We accept the concession.

Execution of sentences in 91D104506 and 89D100516 modified by deletion of requirement that they be served consecutively; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from six judgments requiring execution of defendant’s previously suspended sentences for four convictions for driving under the influence of intoxicants and two convictions for driving while suspended. The state concedes that the court erred by ordering that the sentences in 91D104506 and 89D100516 run consecutively both to each other and to the sentences for three other unrelated convictions. State v. McBride, 103 Or App 642, 798 P2d 728 (1990). We accept the concession.

Execution of sentences in 91D104506 and 89D100516 modified by deletion of requirement that they be served consecutively; otherwise affirmed.

State v. Swearengen, 854 P.2d 505, 121 Or. App. 425, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1015 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

854 P.2d 505 (State v. Swearengen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related