State v. Swartz

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 855
CourtCuyahoga Circuit Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 855 (State v. Swartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Swartz, 9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 855 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question whether there could be such a marriage arose in the case of J. W. Swartz, who was convicted of bigamy, on the basis of a common law marriage, in the criminal court pf Cuyahoga county.

The circuit court upholds the decision of the lower court, and says that the evidence of cohabitation, recognition of children and the holding out of the woman as one’s wife is competent to establish a common law marriage, which is valid in Ohio, and as such may be the basis for the conviction on the charge of bigamy. The circuit court holds further that there cannct be a marriage for one purpose that is not a marriage for all purposes of that contract, and the statute says that a man who has one wife and marries another is guilty of bigamy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of County Commissioners v. City of Osborne
180 P. 233 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-swartz-ohcirctcuyahoga-1896.