State v. . Swann

65 N.C. 330
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1871·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Reade, J.

1. It is not necessary that an indictment under a statute should be in the very words of the statute — as where the statute makes it indictable and punishable in the Penitentiary for one to shoot atanother with “any kind of firearms,” it is sufficient to charge that it was “ with a certain pistol, then and there, loaded with gunpowder and one leaden bullet,” because the Court can see that this is a “fire-arm.”

And so it was not necessary to charge that it was a “deadly weapon ” in the words of the statute; because the Court will take notice that a loaded pistol within carrying distance is a deadly weapon.

2. The statute, Acts 1868-’69, ch. 167, seo. 8, does not make the offence charged a felony, and therefore it was not necessary to charge that it was done with a felonious intent.

There is no error. This will be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Swann, 65 N.C. 330 (N.C. 1871).

65 N.C. 330 (State v. . Swann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Frisbee.
55 S.E. 722 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
State v. Bond
90 S.W. 830 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)
Keesier v. State
56 N.E. 232 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1900)
State v. Clayton
100 Mo. 516 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1890)