State v. Svendrowski

692 S.W.2d 348, 1985 Mo. App. LEXIS 4061
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 1985·No. No. 48669·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

CRIST, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a jury conviction of the misdemeanor grade offense of operating a motor vehicle without a license in violation of § 302.020, RSMo 1978. He was fined $100.00. We affirm.

[349] Defendant asserts the state had no right to require his social security number as a condition precedent to the issuance of his driver’s license. A driver’s license is a privilege or qualified right. Blydenburg v. David, 413 S.W.2d 284, 289 (Mo. banc 1967). It was reasonable to require defendant furnish his social security number for identification purposes as a condition precedent to the issuance of his driver’s license. There was no constitutional infirmity. Conant v. Hill, 326 F.Supp. 25 (E.D.Va.1971).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

DOWD, P.J., and CRANDALL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Svendrowski, 692 S.W.2d 348, 1985 Mo. App. LEXIS 4061 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).

692 S.W.2d 348 (State v. Svendrowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Skurdal
767 P.2d 304 (Montana Supreme Court, 1988)
Bradley v. McNeill
709 S.W.2d 153 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1986)
City of Spokane v. Port
716 P.2d 945 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1986)