State v. Sutton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Sutton

164 S.E.2d 392, 3 N.C. App. 230, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 834

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 11, 1968

DocketNo. 6830SC461

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 S.E.2d 392 (State v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sutton, 164 S.E.2d 392, 3 N.C. App. 230, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 834 (N.C. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

BROCK, J.

Defendant’s only assignment of error is to the entry of the judgment..This assignment of error presents the record proper for review. 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152. We note that the pleas of guilty tendered by the defendant were accepted only after Judge Jackson had carefully examined the defendant and advised him of the possible consequences of his pleas. The sentence imposed was within statutory limits. G.S. 14-335.

With appropriate candor, defendant’s court-appointed counsel has stated that his review of the record of the proceedings discloses no prejudicial error. We agree with counsel’s appraisal.

No error.

Britt and Parker, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI