State v. Sutton

236 S.W.3d 650, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1169, 2007 WL 2363591
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 21, 2007·No. ED 88504·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*651 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leandre Sutton appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of felony trafficking in the second degree and the misdemeanor of possessing drug paraphernalia. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Sutton’s request for a mistrial after a police detective referred to uncharged crimes during his testimony. We also find that the trial court did not plainly err in allowing testimony about the confidential informant’s out-of-court statements.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sutton, 236 S.W.3d 650, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1169, 2007 WL 2363591 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

236 S.W.3d 650 (State v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Graves
236 S.W.3d 650 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)