State v. Sutton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sutton

838 S.W.2d 521, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1611, 1992 WL 292478

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Sutton. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 795 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 1992·No. No. 60932·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals following his conviction by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(4). We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals following his conviction by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(4). We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Sutton, 838 S.W.2d 521, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1611, 1992 WL 292478 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

838 S.W.2d 521 (State v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.