State v. Sutherland
15 A.2d 749, 125 N.J.L. 273, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 325
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Bodine, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Hague, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Heher, Raeeerty, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sutherland, 15 A.2d 749, 125 N.J.L. 273, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 325 (N.J. 1940).
15 A.2d 749 (State v. Sutherland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. DellaCamera
353 A.2d 750 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1974)
State v. Kerley
97 S.E.2d 876 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)