State v. Suprenuk

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Suprenuk

147 A. 924, 7 N.J. Misc. 1048, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 50

DecidedNovember 14, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 147 A. 924 (State v. Suprenuk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Suprenuk, 147 A. 924, 7 N.J. Misc. 1048, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 50 (N.J. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

■ Suprenuk was convicted of carnal abuse upon a child twelve years of age. He was sentenced on January 5th, 1928. The writ of error was tested January 10th, 1929.

Counsel for the defendant below filed ten reasons for reversal but this brief merely argues the question of weight of evidence, with cursory reference to an excepted question.

Without considering the effect of the late date of issuing the writ, or the propriety of arguing the weight of evidence on a strict writ of error we have carefully examined the evidence and conclude that the verdict was not contrary to the weight thereof and that the court did not err in disallowing the question propounded by counsel for the defendant below.

The judgment below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

■ Suprenuk was convicted of carnal abuse upon a child twelve years of age. He was sentenced on January 5th, 1928. The writ of error was tested January 10th, 1929.

Counsel for the defendant below filed ten reasons for reversal but this brief merely argues the question of weight of evidence, with cursory reference to an excepted question.

Without considering the effect of the late date of issuing the writ, or the propriety of arguing the weight of evidence on a strict writ of error we have carefully examined the evidence and conclude that the verdict was not contrary to the weight thereof and that the court did not err in disallowing the question propounded by counsel for the defendant below.

The judgment below will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A. 924, 7 N.J. Misc. 1048, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-suprenuk-nj-1929.