State v. Superior Court

754 P.2d 1351, 157 Ariz. 76, 9 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3, 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 72
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Superior Court. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 Ariz. 269
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 1988·No. No. CV-87-0387-PR·Published

Opinion

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

We granted review of this case in order to resolve an issue of first impression.

We affirm and approve the Court of Appeals’ holding that, under A.R.S. § 23-1023(B), a workers’ compensation claim assigned by operation of law to the State Compensation Fund may be conditionally reassigned to the claimant so as to preclude claims against the state after the reassignment. State v. Superior Court, 155 Ariz. 166, 745 P.2d 614 (1987).

FELDMAN, V.C.J., and CAMERON, HOLOHAN and MOELLER, JJ., concur. Justice FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., did not participate in this decision. Pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 3, [77]*77Judge LLOYD FERNANDEZ, Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two, was designated to sit in his stead.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Superior Court, 754 P.2d 1351, 157 Ariz. 76, 9 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3, 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 72 (Ark. 1988).

754 P.2d 1351 (State v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Superior Court
745 P.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1987)