State v. Superior Court

754 P.2d 1351, 157 Ariz. 76, 9 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3, 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 72
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedMay 24, 1988
DocketNo. CV-87-0387-PR
StatusPublished

This text of 754 P.2d 1351 (State v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Superior Court, 754 P.2d 1351, 157 Ariz. 76, 9 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3, 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 72 (Ark. 1988).

Opinion

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

We granted review of this case in order to resolve an issue of first impression.

We affirm and approve the Court of Appeals’ holding that, under A.R.S. § 23-1023(B), a workers’ compensation claim assigned by operation of law to the State Compensation Fund may be conditionally reassigned to the claimant so as to preclude claims against the state after the reassignment. State v. Superior Court, 155 Ariz. 166, 745 P.2d 614 (1987).

FELDMAN, V.C.J., and CAMERON, HOLOHAN and MOELLER, JJ., concur. Justice FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., did not participate in this decision. Pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 3, [77]*77Judge LLOYD FERNANDEZ, Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two, was designated to sit in his stead.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Superior Court
745 P.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
754 P.2d 1351, 157 Ariz. 76, 9 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3, 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-superior-court-ariz-1988.