State v. Superior Court
754 P.2d 1351, 157 Ariz. 76, 9 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3, 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 72
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Superior Court. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 Ariz. 269 →
Opinion
We granted review of this case in order to resolve an issue of first impression.
We affirm and approve the Court of Appeals’ holding that, under A.R.S. § 23-1023(B), a workers’ compensation claim assigned by operation of law to the State Compensation Fund may be conditionally reassigned to the claimant so as to preclude claims against the state after the reassignment. State v. Superior Court, 155 Ariz. 166, 745 P.2d 614 (1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Superior Court, 754 P.2d 1351, 157 Ariz. 76, 9 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3, 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 72 (Ark. 1988).
754 P.2d 1351 (State v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Superior Court
745 P.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1987)