State v. Sunnafrank

921 P.2d 428, 142 Or. App. 590, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1172
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 21, 1996·No. 93CR2544FE; CA A88218·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of this matter as being barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. The state argues, and defendant concedes, that United States v. Ursery, _ US _, 116 S Ct 762, 133 L Ed 2d 707 (1996), compels reversal of the trial court’s disposition, which was based solely on pre-Ursery federal authority. We agree. See, e.g., Umatilla County v. $18,005 in U.S. Currency, 142 Or App 513, 921 P2d 426 (1996); State v. Vettrus, 142 Or App 359, 922 P2d 673 (1996).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sunnafrank, 921 P.2d 428, 142 Or. App. 590, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1172 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

921 P.2d 428 (State v. Sunnafrank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Vettrus
922 P.2d 673 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
Umatilla County v. $18,005 in U.S. Currency
921 P.2d 426 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
United States v. Ursery
516 U.S. 1070 (Supreme Court, 1996)
Degen v. United States
516 U.S. 1070 (Supreme Court, 1996)