State v. Sunnafrank
This text of 921 P.2d 428 (State v. Sunnafrank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of this matter as being barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. The state argues, and defendant concedes, that United States v. Ursery, _ US _, 116 S Ct 762, 133 L Ed 2d 707 (1996), compels reversal of the trial court’s disposition, which was based solely on pre-Ursery federal authority. We agree. See, e.g., Umatilla County v. $18,005 in U.S. Currency, 142 Or App 513, 921 P2d 426 (1996); State v. Vettrus, 142 Or App 359, 922 P2d 673 (1996).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
921 P.2d 428, 142 Or. App. 590, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sunnafrank-orctapp-1996.